top of page
  • Writer's pictureSave Rimrose Valley

PRESS RELEASE: Campaigners hope High Court challenge can save country park

The High Court is set to hear Transport Action Network’s (TAN) challenge to the £27.4 billion second Road Investment Strategy (RIS2), which includes the controversial Port of Liverpool Access scheme, on 29 and 30 June [1]. The action group which campaigns for sustainable transport solutions is claiming that Grant Shapps, Secretary of State for Transport, broke the law when approving RIS2 by failing to consider its effects on the environment.

Published in March 2020, RIS2 sets out plans for England’s Strategic Road Network (SRN), including 50 major road schemes, one of which would see a dual carriageway constructed along the length of Rimrose Valley Country Park in Sefton. Although the network, made up of motorways and major A roads, is responsible for over 10% of the UK’s domestic CO2 emissions, ministers quietly abandoned setting a target to reduce this [2]. Government lawyers are now seeking to persuade the Court that climate commitments were not “obviously material” to roadbuilding. This is despite Shapps acknowledging two weeks after rubber stamping RIS2 that “climate change is the most pressing environmental challenge of our time” and that this meant we need to “use our cars less in future” [3].

Chris Todd, Director of Transport Action Network said:

“Trying to argue climate change isn’t “obviously material” to approving the largest ever roads programme is like saying public health is not relevant to reform of smoking rules. In an audacious attempt to protect his addiction to asphalt, Shapps is now seeking a legal precedent that decision-makers can ignore climate targets.

This puts ministers on a collision course with the Climate Change Committee, which last week called on the Government to adopt a ‘Net Zero Test’ for all policy decisions. The DfT’s dodgy defence now risks undermining UK leadership of the COP26 climate summit and our international standing.”

The Government’s backup defence is that in any event ministers did consider climate commitments. Besides heavily redacted legal advice that asserted RIS2 was “consistent” with net zero, the Department for Transport (DfT) is relying on an assessment made after the decision. This concluded as RIS2’s impact was so small as to be “de minimis” that ministers had been justified in ignoring the policy gap to meet new climate targets. TAN obtained the help of two of the UK’s leading transport experts to review the figures [4]. Shockingly, they concluded RIS2 climate impacts were likely one hundred times greater, as DfT:

  • Only considered the impact of five newly announced schemes, not the whole roads programme of over fifty major road schemes;

  • Calculated carbon for a period when not all those five schemes were fully open, and

  • Ignored non-tailpipe emissions such as from land clearance and road construction.

Rebecca Lush, roads campaigner at TAN, added:

“How can ministers expect to be taken seriously if they ignore the carbon emissions from all but 100 out of the 4,000 miles of road the Chancellor announced at Budget 2020. It’s as if they are trying to pass off an old banger as a brand-new electric vehicle. Such extreme fiddling of the figures would put even the dodgiest second-hand car dealer to shame. It’s time to shift this outdated roads plan off the forecourt and onto the scrapheap.”

Days before the hearing, the Welsh Government announced a freeze on roadbuilding. Separately, the Climate Change Committee (CCC) recommended that “investment in roads should be contingent on analysis justifying how they contribute to the UK’s pathway to Net Zero”, directly challenging the DfT’s existing policy. To secure the 63% cut in emissions needed between 2019 and 2035, the CCC is calling on the Government to “prioritise funding away from car use” and to provide “measures to make it less attractive to drive” [5].

Todd concluded:

“If we are serious about tackling the climate emergency, improving quality of life after the pandemic and delivering a less congested future, we need to reduce traffic. This case, the biggest legal challenge to transport policy in British history, seeks to do just that. A ruling to quash the largest ever roads programme would be historic, not just for the UK, but for communities worldwide seeking to build back better in the run up to COP26.”

Stuart Bennett from the Save Rimrose Valley campaign added:

"We know that the government’s proposed Port of Liverpool Access Scheme would generate huge carbon emissions, destroy Rimrose Valley’s unique biodiversity and generate air pollution. We are therefore incredibly grateful to Transport Action Network for bringing this legal challenge, for fighting to protect the environment and for drawing attention to the destruction roadbuilding causes. If their challenge is successful, it could spell the end for this ill-conceived project.”

Anyone who wishes to add their support to the legal challenge are asked to kindly consider donating towards the legal fees, but making a donation via TAN's CrowdJustice page:


[1] R (Transport Action Network Ltd) v Secretary of State for Transport and Another [CO/2003/2020] will be heard at the Royal Courts of Justice. TAN is represented by Rowan Smith at Leigh Day solicitors, David Wolfe QC (Matrix Chambers) and Pete Lockley (11 KBW). Due to current restrictions, the hearing cannot be attended in person but online access can be arranged by contacting on Monday. The following are also available online: Road Investment Strategy 2 (RIS2): 2020 to 2025 and TAN’s case pleadings and evidence.

[2] The UK’s 2019 net domestic CO2 emissions were 351.5 MtCO2, while the SRN figure was 35.6 MtCO2 for 2015 but emissions did not decrease before the pandemic. RIS1, published in 2014, required Highways England to develop a metric of carbon emissions “arising from use of the Network”. This was due to be in place by 2020 but quietly dropped when RIS2 was published.

[4] The expert evidence of Professor Phil Goodwin, Emeritus Professor at University College London and University of the West of England, and Professor Jillian Anable, Professor at the Institute of Transport Studies at the University of Leeds, is available online.

[5] Plenary 22/06/2021 - Welsh Parliament and CCC 2021 Progress Report to Parliament. NB The widely cited 78% target relates to cutting emissions between 1990 (rather than 2019) and 2035. See pp16, 164, 209 and 210 of CCC Report.

TAN helps local communities fighting damaging road schemes and savage bus cuts. Although only established in 2019, it brings together people with over 50 years’ experience of environmental campaigning. More information at

112 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All


bottom of page